ISSEN Inclusive Science and Special Education Needs
   


Home
CD Resources
Aims / Policies

Articles
Database
Links
Contact

ASE

The National Association for Special Education Needs


 
 
 

Project Aims & Policies

Aims sub-links

Background|Joint Statement |NASEN|ASE|NC Inclusion

NASEN Policy Statement

NASEN has embarked on a programme of formulating and publishing policies which will make a public statement about objectives and good practice in the world of special educational needs. Included here are overviews from two of the policy statements that may be of interest in connection with the ISSEN project:

Inclusion Policy (overview)
Curriculum Access Policy (overview)

Inclusion: The Policy Context
Both nationally and internationally, there is an ongoing debate about the merits of greater inclusion for children with special educational needs. This is often defined simplistically in terms of placement.

Some parents, disabled people and professionals argue that children deprived of mainstream access are being denied a basic human right to be educated alongside their peers.

Others, however, point out that children's attendance at mainstream school does not guarantee their needs are met. They argue that children require an appropriate curriculum, resources and positive staff attitudes and skills to ensure that they are 'included' in any meaningful sense.

At the other extreme, there are those who see inclusion of all children in mainstream schooling as either impractical or else so demanding of resources that it would breach the principle of a reasonable and equitable use of resources for the school population as a whole. Some argue that their special educational needs can only be met within a segregated provision.

In NASEN's view, inclusion is not a simple concept, restricted to issues of placement. Its definition has to encompass broad notions of educational access and recognise the importance of catering for diverse needs. Increasing mainstream access is an important goal. However, it will not develop spontaneously and needs to be actively planned for and promoted. Moreover, inclusive principles highlight the importance of meeting children's individual needs, of working in partnership with pupils and their parents/carers and of involving teachers and schools in the development of more inclusive approaches. Inclusion is a process not a state.

Key Principles
This is an over view of the the key principles which form part of NASEN’s inclusion policy:

  • Valuing diversity
  • Entitlement
  • Dignity
  • Individual needs
  • Planning
  • Collective responsibility
  • Professional developements
  • Equal opportunities

The policy statement goes on to outline school, local authority and central government responsibilities that should be followed to enable us to work towards inclusion

For further information and the full NASEN policy statement for Inclusion click here.

Back to top

Curriculum Access: the policy context
It has only been in the last 30 years that it has been formally recognised that all children with special educational needs are educable. Since then, there has been continuing debate about the nature of the curriculum that is most appropriate for them and the degree to which they can or should be expected to access the curriculum typically provided for most pupils in schools.

On the one hand, there have been concerns that rigid adherence to the broader curriculum normally available to most children may deny the opportunity to adequately meet individual needs and to exploit pupils' strengths and interests. On the other, there are risks that any alternative or modified curriculum can become too restrictive. There are also dangers that the status of such alternatives can become devalued, leading to renewed concerns that pupils with special educational needs themselves will be regarded as second class citizens.

NASEN welcomes the increasing commitment in recent government documents to a curriculum that includes all children. However, it recognises that considerable discussion has been promoted about the circumstances under which such a curriculum might still be disapplied, both in terms of the underlying rationale and the nature, status and quality of any alternative. A fundamental concern is that all pupils should have access to a curriculum that is good quality, meaningful and appropriate to their individual needs and that does not compromise their entitlements.

Key Principles

  • Entitlement
  • Individualised Learning
  • Equal Value
  • Effective teaching and learning
  • Importance of professional development
  • Funding

The policy statement goes on to outline school, local authority and central government responsibilities that should be followed to enable curriculum access.

For further information and the full NASEN policy statement for Curriculum Access click here

Back to top